showing a young boy experiencing Gaslighting he is in front of chalkboard with a bunch of question marks drawn on it. boy is looking up as if confused

Gaslighting: separating truth from myth

Every once in a while, I feel compelled to clear up some “misinformation” ubiquitously shared. Today, the focus is understanding gaslighting.

Gaslighting happens when one person questions another’s perception of reality. In the broadest terms, they try to tell you that you don’t feel what you feel or think what you think.

And this is key: the goal is to manipulate your reality, so they gain power and control over you.

Gaslighting is NOT people having a different opinion, debating with you, or trying to help you feel better; as long as the person acknowledges your perspective (note: I didn’t say agree with your perspective).

The origins of the term

It’s been reported the term gaslighting comes from the 1938 play and subsequent movie “Gas Light,” where a husband attempts to convince his wife that she is going insane by manipulating the gas lights in their home.

As a therapist I hear couple’s bandy this term at each other regularly and incorrectly. Individuals claim they have been “gaslit” during conflicts.

It’s up there with the number of times a day I hear someone label another as a Narcissist. Typically, though, people use these terms inaccurately.

Interestingly, I NEVER hear this term used by parents or teachers regarding their interactions with children. And, it is the area I see the MOST gaslighting.

young boy with mouth skewed and finger on chin as if he is thinking and confused. an example of gaslighting
How do adults’ gaslight children?

Adults’ gaslight children when they dismiss or deny a child’s perspective: the child’s thoughts, feelings, perceptions, beliefs, and/or body sensations. In the rush to fix/control/manage/organize/persuade/and even teach children, adults might be gaslighting.

Consider this example I witnessed when I was doing a classroom observation between a four-year-old boy and his teacher:

Child: “Teacher, I want a turn with the bikes. I’ve been waiting, but Becca won’t give me a chance to ride.”

Teacher (in a chipper tone of voice): “We have so many other things to play with! You love playing in the mud pit and playing soccer. Why don’t you go try one of those? You will love it.”

How might this example promote your understanding of gaslighting?

The teacher did not acknowledge the boy’s perspective. At all. In that moment his focus was on getting a turn on the bike. She focused on finding him a different play option. Not the same.

And, she implied the boy didn’t know his own mind. He’s saying he wants the bike. The teacher says but you love soccer and the mud pit. Huh?

This might read to you like she was trying to be helpful. But when I videotaped this exchange, it seemed more like the teacher’s attempt to control the child’s behavior.

It seemed like she thought it would be easier for HER if he just found something else to play with. Although I wasn’t sure what was going on from the teacher’s perspective yet, I observed she did not actively engage the child’s perspective about waiting so long for a bike.

We had our meeting scheduled for right after this observation. I endeavored to discover her perspective in that meeting.

man scratching his head with hand out palm upturned as if he is curious about exploring gaslighting
Exploring gaslighting: a non-judgmental gaze

When the teacher and I watched the video clip of this exchange, she spoke up right away:

“Laura, sometimes I just can’t handle yet another conflict between two kids. I didn’t have it in me to facilitate a conversation between the two kids about the bike.

I just needed him to find something else to do. It’s true: I sometimes pick classroom management over child development.”

She was referring to a training I offer teachers called “Moving from Classroom Management toward Child Development”.

The training demonstrates that when we focus on developing the child, the classroom gets managed. But, when we focus on classroom management, we often hinder child development.

Meaning, the teacher put her need for the classroom to be managed above the child’s need for skill development. I appreciated her vulnerability and willingness to discuss this so openly.

Teaching and Parenting are hard work. Sometimes we don’t “have it in us.” Real Talk.

What are the risks of gaslighting?

When adults’ gaslight children, even unintentionally, the risk is they don’t feel seen, soothed, safe, or secure. The 4 S’s of attachment.

And, as you likely know, secure attachment is foundational for mental and relational health. Symptoms that can arise from not being seen over time?

They include anxiety, depression, indecisiveness/self-doubt, trichotillomania, eating disorders, insecurity, relational challenges, and substance issues to help one numb out. When humans don’t obtain a secure attachment with at least one other adult, it can lead to symptoms such as these or others.

Worst case scenario, repeated gaslighting may lead to a trauma reaction.

Part of understanding gaslighting includes being accountable for our actions regardless of our intentions. It’s hard to do, but being honest with ourselves promotes mental and relational, health.

For ourselves and for children as well.

The pressures on teachers to MANAGE the class can leave them feeling overwhelmed and hopeless. And parents feel this pressure as well. To make sure their kids “behave.”

But when adults focus on developing children’s skills versus managing their behaviors, the classroom/home runs much more smoothly. The children have less challenging behavior. When they “feel felt,” they tend to “do better.”

In this case, the teacher missed an opportunity to facilitate the two children working toward resolution on this issue; instead, she resolved it. Both children lost out on strengthening their conflict resolution skills. But potentially worse, the boy might have walked away not feeling “seen.” The teacher didn’t intend any of that, of course. She was just trying to cope with her stress!

adult tries to separate two fighting kids to show gaslighting because she isn't pausing to help them discuss
How to avoid gaslighting

The teacher showed such vulnerability and openness by sharing with me the overwhelm she felt. No wonder she responded to the boy in that moment with an attempt to redirect his gaze to choose something else. That in itself is not wrong if she had attuned first.

I validated the teacher’s perspective (you won’t catch me gaslighting in this article!) with this:

“You make sense. It can be exhausting to work with little kids, right? It seems like there is a teachable moment every second! You work so hard.”

I honored her perspective, even though I did not agree with her behavior. Please read that again.

Together we laughed, and I offered her a middle path:

“When you feel like you don’t have it ‘in you’ in the future, I wonder if you might be able to acknowledge the child’s perspective and ask him to come up with solutions instead?” To attune first.

 It might sound like this:

“Oh, wow. You have been so patient waiting for your turn. It’s hard to wait, huh? Yet you have been trying to let her know you are still waiting, and she has not gotten off yet. Gosh, no wonder you seem really frustrated. What do you think your choices are until Becca is done with the bike?”

The teacher liked this idea because I honored the fact that she isn’t superhuman and gave her an example of attuning to the child’s perspective. She agreed this would feel less challenging than facilitating a discussion between the two kids which is what she was avoiding because of her stress.

Sometimes parents and teachers need to give themselves a break. I did not try to control or manipulate her. I attuned to her overwhelm and offered an option to consider.

adult attuning to a child to avoid gaslighting

The steps to conflict resolution take much more time and effort than the alternative of acknowledging and engaging the child in considering his options. And this “teaching move” of acknowledging the child still teaches him something.

He learns his thoughts and feelings matter and he begins to develop a sense of agency over resolving his problems as they arise.

In this way, he might feel seen, soothed, safe, and secure.

Another example I have to share (because I hear it so frequently) involves adults’ dismissing a child’s feelings. I cannot count how often I witness some form of children’s feelings being dismissed or denied.

For example, yesterday I heard a neighbor’s child say, “Mommy, I am sad right now.” To which the mother replied (in a cheery tone), “You’re not sad. You’re fine. Smile, there isn’t anything to be sad about.”

Gaslighting.

Adult looking directly into child's eyes as they play with blocks signifying the opposite of gaslighting; attuned engagement
Move from manipulation to attuned engagement

My theory?

The less we gaslight kids, the more they will develop the skills they need to become adults who will not resort to gaslighting.

Please read that again.

When we attune to a child’s perspective, we set the foundation for the learning of appropriate social, emotional, and relational skills to navigate differences in perspective that arise. Understanding gaslighting starts by acknowledging that you might be inadvertently doing it to others, including children.

But please gaze upon yourself with compassion. You might not have the skill yet, or the bandwidth to perform the skill of tolerating the other person’s perspective in the moment. You are human.

I am not sure of my neighbor’s state of mind because I just overheard the brief exchange. But when I work directly with adults dismissing a child’s emotions, they typically tell me they don’t know what “to do” with children’s feelings.

They were never shown how to identify, understand, express, and manage emotions; instead, they were told to stop the feeling, rushed to happy, or worse, punished. People tell me this was their experience: cross-culturally and trans-gender.

The lack of direct teaching to promote the skills of emotional intelligence seems widespread.

Inadvertently or on purpose, adults may manipulate children away from their emotions because the adults don’t know what to do. They feel out of control.

Remember our definition of gaslighting above. The goal of gaslighting is to gain power or control. I have compassion for adults who feel this way. And yet this is still…

Gaslighting.

Of course, you may be thinking sometimes I just want to limit children’s suffering from the strong emotions. I get that. Even so, dismissing a child’s thoughts, feelings, beliefs, body sensations can, over time, lead to GREATER suffering.

No matter what your intention, dismissing or denying a child’s perspective risks leaving the child feeling unseen, unsafe, and insecure.

The good news is you can still validate a child’s perspective even if you don’t agree. I modeled this for you with my validation of the teacher above. When you replace gaslighting with attuned engagement, you promote the child’s social, emotional, relational, and cognitive skills.

That’s just one way to do this. Contact me if you need more guidance with this!

Feel free to visit my You Tube Channel for ways to attune to a child’s perspective or check out my Resources page for more information.

#gaslightingdefined

#doingbetterforchildren

#workingsmarternotharder

#21stcenturyteaching

Scroll to Top